| U.S. Census of 2000: Texas Civilian Population by Percent of Poverty Income Categories by County (Based on 1999 Income) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Data do not account for people living in institutions). | |||||||||||||||||||||
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Anderson | 40,401 | 2,812 | 1,835 | 2,007 | 2,466 | Anderson | 2,550 | 2,231 | 1,079 | 1,323 | 24,098 | Anderson | 6,654 | 16.5% | 9,120 | 22.6% | Anderson | 11,670 | 28.9% | 16,303 | 40.4% |
| Andrews | 12,892 | 879 | 492 | 746 | 770 | Andrews | 758 | 698 | 424 | 491 | 7,634 | Andrews | 2,117 | 16.4% | 2,887 | 22.4% | Andrews | 3,645 | 28.3% | 5,258 | 40.8% |
| Angelina | 77,567 | 5,025 | 2,853 | 4,363 | 4,422 | Angelina | 4,493 | 4,557 | 2,463 | 2,623 | 46,768 | Angelina | 12,241 | 15.8% | 16,663 | 21.5% | Angelina | 21,156 | 27.3% | 30,799 | 39.7% |
| Aransas | 22,241 | 1,846 | 1,531 | 1,052 | 1,489 | Aransas | 1,453 | 1,061 | 594 | 608 | 12,607 | Aransas | 4,429 | 19.9% | 5,918 | 26.6% | Aransas | 7,371 | 33.1% | 9,634 | 43.3% |
| Archer | 8,796 | 279 | 210 | 299 | 368 | Archer | 358 | 499 | 256 | 261 | 6,266 | Archer | 788 | 9.0% | 1,156 | 13.1% | Archer | 1,514 | 17.2% | 2,530 | 28.8% |
| Armstrong | 2,065 | 58 | 67 | 94 | 59 | Armstrong | 128 | 124 | 16 | 50 | 1,469 | Armstrong | 219 | 10.6% | 278 | 13.5% | Armstrong | 406 | 19.7% | 596 | 28.9% |
| Atascosa | 38,122 | 2,852 | 1,915 | 2,934 | 2,260 | Atascosa | 2,544 | 2,126 | 1,070 | 1,562 | 20,859 | Atascosa | 7,701 | 20.2% | 9,961 | 26.1% | Atascosa | 12,505 | 32.8% | 17,263 | 45.3% |
| Austin | 23,345 | 1,011 | 760 | 1,043 | 1,393 | Austin | 1,433 | 918 | 462 | 586 | 15,739 | Austin | 2,814 | 12.1% | 4,207 | 18.0% | Austin | 5,640 | 24.2% | 7,606 | 32.6% |
| Bailey | 6,520 | 409 | 208 | 470 | 767 | Bailey | 443 | 684 | 139 | 124 | 3,276 | Bailey | 1,087 | 16.7% | 1,854 | 28.4% | Bailey | 2,297 | 35.2% | 3,244 | 49.8% |
| Bandera | 17,500 | 942 | 422 | 531 | 971 | Bandera | 1,001 | 962 | 381 | 563 | 11,727 | Bandera | 1,895 | 10.8% | 2,866 | 16.4% | Bandera | 3,867 | 22.1% | 5,773 | 33.0% |
| Bastrop | 55,577 | 2,888 | 1,627 | 1,941 | 2,627 | Bastrop | 2,596 | 2,453 | 971 | 1,672 | 38,802 | Bastrop | 6,456 | 11.6% | 9,083 | 16.3% | Bastrop | 11,679 | 21.0% | 16,775 | 30.2% |
| Baylor | 4,044 | 241 | 253 | 158 | 348 | Baylor | 447 | 129 | 110 | 57 | 2,301 | Baylor | 652 | 16.1% | 1,000 | 24.7% | Baylor | 1,447 | 35.8% | 1,743 | 43.1% |
| Bee | 24,761 | 2,555 | 1,727 | 1,650 | 1,365 | Bee | 1,429 | 1,238 | 833 | 774 | 13,190 | Bee | 5,932 | 24.0% | 7,297 | 29.5% | Bee | 8,726 | 35.2% | 11,571 | 46.7% |
| Bell | 228,535 | 11,303 | 6,931 | 9,373 | 10,946 | Bell | 13,386 | 13,227 | 5,738 | 8,268 | 149,363 | Bell | 27,607 | 12.1% | 38,553 | 16.9% | Bell | 51,939 | 22.7% | 79,172 | 34.6% |
| Bexar | 1,359,271 | 93,803 | 54,583 | 67,350 | 73,936 | Bexar | 79,813 | 72,111 | 29,399 | 43,038 | 845,238 | Bexar | 215,736 | 15.9% | 289,672 | 21.3% | Bexar | 369,485 | 27.2% | 514,033 | 37.8% |
| Blanco | 8,251 | 417 | 249 | 256 | 386 | Blanco | 271 | 297 | 270 | 285 | 5,820 | Blanco | 922 | 11.2% | 1,308 | 15.9% | Blanco | 1,579 | 19.1% | 2,431 | 29.5% |
| Borden | 729 | 29 | 34 | 39 | 73 | Borden | 7 | 37 | 10 | 17 | 483 | Borden | 102 | 14.0% | 175 | 24.0% | Borden | 182 | 25.0% | 246 | 33.7% |
| Bosque | 16,703 | 720 | 524 | 873 | 935 | Bosque | 1,046 | 913 | 334 | 603 | 10,755 | Bosque | 2,117 | 12.7% | 3,052 | 18.3% | Bosque | 4,098 | 24.5% | 5,948 | 35.6% |
| Bowie | 82,763 | 6,696 | 3,715 | 4,217 | 3,961 | Bowie | 4,312 | 4,512 | 1,429 | 2,230 | 51,691 | Bowie | 14,628 | 17.7% | 18,589 | 22.5% | Bowie | 22,901 | 27.7% | 31,072 | 37.5% |
| Brazoria | 230,436 | 11,093 | 5,545 | 6,827 | 8,632 | Brazoria | 8,974 | 10,032 | 4,121 | 5,214 | 169,998 | Brazoria | 23,465 | 10.2% | 32,097 | 13.9% | Brazoria | 41,071 | 17.8% | 60,438 | 26.2% |
| Brazos | 139,110 | 21,574 | 8,290 | 7,553 | 7,041 | Brazos | 6,702 | 6,489 | 2,568 | 3,704 | 75,189 | Brazos | 37,417 | 26.9% | 44,458 | 32.0% | Brazos | 51,160 | 36.8% | 63,921 | 45.9% |
| Brewster | 8,466 | 678 | 379 | 482 | 762 | Brewster | 484 | 430 | 124 | 219 | 4,908 | Brewster | 1,539 | 18.2% | 2,301 | 27.2% | Brewster | 2,785 | 32.9% | 3,558 | 42.0% |
| Briscoe | 1,788 | 110 | 106 | 70 | 145 | Briscoe | 136 | 152 | 65 | 71 | 933 | Briscoe | 286 | 16.0% | 431 | 24.1% | Briscoe | 567 | 31.7% | 855 | 47.8% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Brooks | 7,868 | 1,678 | 599 | 883 | 287 | Brooks | 714 | 597 | 345 | 268 | 2,497 | Brooks | 3,160 | 40.2% | 3,447 | 43.8% | Brooks | 4,161 | 52.9% | 5,371 | 68.3% |
| Brown | 35,327 | 2,519 | 1,565 | 1,998 | 2,167 | Brown | 2,343 | 1,926 | 700 | 1,076 | 21,033 | Brown | 6,082 | 17.2% | 8,249 | 23.4% | Brown | 10,592 | 30.0% | 14,294 | 40.5% |
| Burleson | 16,347 | 1,092 | 638 | 1,083 | 595 | Burleson | 992 | 1,131 | 382 | 445 | 9,989 | Burleson | 2,813 | 17.2% | 3,408 | 20.8% | Burleson | 4,400 | 26.9% | 6,358 | 38.9% |
| Burnet | 33,153 | 1,248 | 842 | 1,524 | 1,756 | Burnet | 2,099 | 1,840 | 653 | 1,014 | 22,177 | Burnet | 3,614 | 10.9% | 5,370 | 16.2% | Burnet | 7,469 | 22.5% | 10,976 | 33.1% |
| Caldwell | 30,386 | 1,511 | 1,064 | 1,396 | 1,826 | Caldwell | 1,869 | 1,959 | 559 | 1,330 | 18,872 | Caldwell | 3,971 | 13.1% | 5,797 | 19.1% | Caldwell | 7,666 | 25.2% | 11,514 | 37.9% |
| Calhoun | 20,389 | 1,505 | 813 | 1,022 | 1,429 | Calhoun | 927 | 1,088 | 547 | 595 | 12,463 | Calhoun | 3,340 | 16.4% | 4,769 | 23.4% | Calhoun | 5,696 | 27.9% | 7,926 | 38.9% |
| Callahan | 12,764 | 607 | 506 | 450 | 624 | Callahan | 908 | 893 | 365 | 538 | 7,873 | Callahan | 1,563 | 12.2% | 2,187 | 17.1% | Callahan | 3,095 | 24.2% | 4,891 | 38.3% |
| Cameron | 330,649 | 47,165 | 29,118 | 33,005 | 28,459 | Cameron | 25,292 | 21,164 | 8,413 | 10,481 | 127,552 | Cameron | 109,288 | 33.1% | 137,747 | 41.7% | Cameron | 163,039 | 49.3% | 203,097 | 61.4% |
| Camp | 11,342 | 1,011 | 454 | 901 | 748 | Camp | 611 | 669 | 193 | 191 | 6,564 | Camp | 2,366 | 20.9% | 3,114 | 27.5% | Camp | 3,725 | 32.8% | 4,778 | 42.1% |
| Carson | 6,419 | 179 | 75 | 214 | 275 | Carson | 261 | 329 | 125 | 206 | 4,755 | Carson | 468 | 7.3% | 743 | 11.6% | Carson | 1,004 | 15.6% | 1,664 | 25.9% |
| Cass | 29,913 | 2,148 | 1,247 | 1,898 | 2,137 | Cass | 1,927 | 1,978 | 436 | 951 | 17,191 | Cass | 5,293 | 17.7% | 7,430 | 24.8% | Cass | 9,357 | 31.3% | 12,722 | 42.5% |
| Castro | 8,206 | 522 | 380 | 658 | 742 | Castro | 746 | 802 | 133 | 323 | 3,900 | Castro | 1,560 | 19.0% | 2,302 | 28.1% | Castro | 3,048 | 37.1% | 4,306 | 52.5% |
| Chambers | 25,719 | 1,090 | 822 | 921 | 904 | Chambers | 1,182 | 863 | 610 | 670 | 18,657 | Chambers | 2,833 | 11.0% | 3,737 | 14.5% | Chambers | 4,919 | 19.1% | 7,062 | 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 43,814 | 3,026 | 2,230 | 2,567 | 3,098 | Cherokee | 3,514 | 2,529 | 1,189 | 1,388 | 24,273 | Cherokee | 7,823 | 17.9% | 10,921 | 24.9% | Cherokee | 14,435 | 32.9% | 19,541 | 44.6% |
| Childress | 5,893 | 490 | 221 | 325 | 438 | Childress | 442 | 314 | 101 | 56 | 3,506 | Childress | 1,036 | 17.6% | 1,474 | 25.0% | Childress | 1,916 | 32.5% | 2,387 | 40.5% |
| Clay | 10,872 | 469 | 231 | 421 | 445 | Clay | 693 | 527 | 249 | 324 | 7,513 | Clay | 1,121 | 10.3% | 1,566 | 14.4% | Clay | 2,259 | 20.8% | 3,359 | 30.9% |
| Cochran | 3,649 | 384 | 347 | 254 | 252 | Cochran | 262 | 215 | 95 | 93 | 1,747 | Cochran | 985 | 27.0% | 1,237 | 33.9% | Cochran | 1,499 | 41.1% | 1,902 | 52.1% |
| Coke | 3,571 | 134 | 142 | 189 | 219 | Coke | 273 | 198 | 79 | 101 | 2,236 | Coke | 465 | 13.0% | 684 | 19.2% | Coke | 957 | 26.8% | 1,335 | 37.4% |
| Coleman | 9,050 | 555 | 553 | 689 | 642 | Coleman | 665 | 657 | 331 | 318 | 4,640 | Coleman | 1,797 | 19.9% | 2,439 | 27.0% | Coleman | 3,104 | 34.3% | 4,410 | 48.7% |
| Collin | 488,777 | 11,265 | 5,164 | 7,355 | 8,368 | Collin | 9,813 | 9,647 | 5,451 | 6,121 | 425,593 | Collin | 23,784 | 4.9% | 32,152 | 6.6% | Collin | 41,965 | 8.6% | 63,184 | 12.9% |
| Collingsworth | 3,154 | 288 | 119 | 183 | 179 | Collingsworth | 401 | 226 | 102 | 63 | 1,593 | Collingsworth | 590 | 18.7% | 769 | 24.4% | Collingsworth | 1,170 | 37.1% | 1,561 | 49.5% |
| Colorado | 19,543 | 1,234 | 893 | 1,044 | 1,147 | Colorado | 1,037 | 1,051 | 356 | 545 | 12,236 | Colorado | 3,171 | 16.2% | 4,318 | 22.1% | Colorado | 5,355 | 27.4% | 7,307 | 37.4% |
| Comal | 76,873 | 2,426 | 1,749 | 2,410 | 3,170 | Comal | 3,370 | 3,152 | 1,401 | 1,951 | 57,244 | Comal | 6,585 | 8.6% | 9,755 | 12.7% | Comal | 13,125 | 17.1% | 19,629 | 25.5% |
| Comanche | 13,659 | 1,080 | 547 | 741 | 1,066 | Comanche | 767 | 937 | 476 | 457 | 7,588 | Comanche | 2,368 | 17.3% | 3,434 | 25.1% | Comanche | 4,201 | 30.8% | 6,071 | 44.4% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Concho | 2,604 | 145 | 40 | 125 | 176 | Concho | 213 | 158 | 64 | 66 | 1,617 | Concho | 310 | 11.9% | 486 | 18.7% | Concho | 699 | 26.8% | 987 | 37.9% |
| Cooke | 35,479 | 2,018 | 1,265 | 1,737 | 1,395 | Cooke | 1,785 | 2,023 | 706 | 1,158 | 23,392 | Cooke | 5,020 | 14.1% | 6,415 | 18.1% | Cooke | 8,200 | 23.1% | 12,087 | 34.1% |
| Coryell | 57,899 | 2,163 | 1,212 | 2,106 | 3,856 | Coryell | 4,690 | 3,854 | 1,563 | 2,225 | 36,230 | Coryell | 5,481 | 9.5% | 9,337 | 16.1% | Coryell | 14,027 | 24.2% | 21,669 | 37.4% |
| Cottle | 1,859 | 129 | 89 | 124 | 115 | Cottle | 103 | 121 | 87 | 52 | 1,039 | Cottle | 342 | 18.4% | 457 | 24.6% | Cottle | 560 | 30.1% | 820 | 44.1% |
| Crane | 3,956 | 192 | 136 | 204 | 325 | Crane | 224 | 208 | 140 | 285 | 2,242 | Crane | 532 | 13.4% | 857 | 21.7% | Crane | 1,081 | 27.3% | 1,714 | 43.3% |
| Crockett | 4,044 | 189 | 293 | 301 | 425 | Crockett | 262 | 195 | 78 | 175 | 2,126 | Crockett | 783 | 19.4% | 1,208 | 29.9% | Crockett | 1,470 | 36.4% | 1,918 | 47.4% |
| Crosby | 6,959 | 664 | 660 | 630 | 604 | Crosby | 449 | 502 | 220 | 214 | 3,016 | Crosby | 1,954 | 28.1% | 2,558 | 36.8% | Crosby | 3,007 | 43.2% | 3,943 | 56.7% |
| Culberson | 2,962 | 222 | 191 | 330 | 197 | Culberson | 308 | 219 | 96 | 124 | 1,275 | Culberson | 743 | 25.1% | 940 | 31.7% | Culberson | 1,248 | 42.1% | 1,687 | 57.0% |
| Dallam | 6,190 | 416 | 215 | 242 | 506 | Dallam | 648 | 672 | 290 | 332 | 2,869 | Dallam | 873 | 14.1% | 1,379 | 22.3% | Dallam | 2,027 | 32.7% | 3,321 | 53.7% |
| Dallas | 2,183,570 | 138,344 | 68,680 | 86,243 | 105,838 | Dallas | 115,289 | 108,829 | 46,580 | 60,361 | 1,453,406 | Dallas | 293,267 | 13.4% | 399,105 | 18.3% | Dallas | 514,394 | 23.6% | 730,164 | 33.4% |
| Dawson | 12,659 | 995 | 619 | 880 | 1,090 | Dawson | 1,166 | 887 | 230 | 707 | 6,085 | Dawson | 2,494 | 19.7% | 3,584 | 28.3% | Dawson | 4,750 | 37.5% | 6,574 | 51.9% |
| Deaf Smith | 18,240 | 1,623 | 817 | 1,309 | 1,509 | Deaf Smith | 1,694 | 1,173 | 546 | 830 | 8,739 | Deaf Smith | 3,749 | 20.6% | 5,258 | 28.8% | Deaf Smith | 6,952 | 38.1% | 9,501 | 52.1% |
| Delta | 5,180 | 246 | 238 | 427 | 185 | Delta | 297 | 440 | 111 | 235 | 3,001 | Delta | 911 | 17.6% | 1,096 | 21.2% | Delta | 1,393 | 26.9% | 2,179 | 42.1% |
| Denton | 423,375 | 13,126 | 6,624 | 8,289 | 9,278 | Denton | 12,042 | 11,724 | 5,552 | 6,699 | 350,041 | Denton | 28,039 | 6.6% | 37,317 | 8.8% | Denton | 49,359 | 11.7% | 73,334 | 17.3% |
| DeWitt | 18,164 | 1,373 | 935 | 1,257 | 1,125 | DeWitt | 1,117 | 870 | 664 | 704 | 10,119 | DeWitt | 3,565 | 19.6% | 4,690 | 25.8% | DeWitt | 5,807 | 32.0% | 8,045 | 44.3% |
| Dickens | 2,230 | 140 | 109 | 139 | 238 | Dickens | 77 | 169 | 65 | 81 | 1,212 | Dickens | 388 | 17.4% | 626 | 28.1% | Dickens | 703 | 31.5% | 1,018 | 45.7% |
| Dimmit | 10,135 | 1,265 | 1,071 | 1,033 | 1,007 | Dimmit | 719 | 758 | 259 | 213 | 3,810 | Dimmit | 3,369 | 33.2% | 4,376 | 43.2% | Dimmit | 5,095 | 50.3% | 6,325 | 62.4% |
| Donley | 3,620 | 214 | 169 | 193 | 218 | Donley | 155 | 235 | 109 | 149 | 2,178 | Donley | 576 | 15.9% | 794 | 21.9% | Donley | 949 | 26.2% | 1,442 | 39.8% |
| Duval | 12,474 | 1,366 | 1,070 | 953 | 1,236 | Duval | 1,077 | 672 | 254 | 424 | 5,422 | Duval | 3,389 | 27.2% | 4,625 | 37.1% | Duval | 5,702 | 45.7% | 7,052 | 56.5% |
| Eastland | 17,497 | 964 | 874 | 1,103 | 1,142 | Eastland | 1,435 | 1,146 | 354 | 662 | 9,817 | Eastland | 2,941 | 16.8% | 4,083 | 23.3% | Eastland | 5,518 | 31.5% | 7,680 | 43.9% |
| Ector | 119,222 | 8,764 | 6,144 | 7,402 | 9,088 | Ector | 7,595 | 7,470 | 3,065 | 4,447 | 65,247 | Ector | 22,310 | 18.7% | 31,398 | 26.3% | Ector | 38,993 | 32.7% | 53,975 | 45.3% |
| Edwards | 2,129 | 280 | 140 | 252 | 152 | Edwards | 228 | 86 | 71 | 78 | 842 | Edwards | 672 | 31.6% | 824 | 38.7% | Edwards | 1,052 | 49.4% | 1,287 | 60.5% |
| Ellis | 109,282 | 3,523 | 2,544 | 3,334 | 4,366 | Ellis | 3,581 | 5,067 | 1,955 | 3,235 | 81,677 | Ellis | 9,401 | 8.6% | 13,767 | 12.6% | Ellis | 17,348 | 15.9% | 27,605 | 25.3% |
| El Paso | 666,676 | 60,139 | 44,598 | 53,985 | 52,379 | El Paso | 49,372 | 44,277 | 17,819 | 22,007 | 322,100 | El Paso | 158,722 | 23.8% | 211,101 | 31.7% | El Paso | 260,473 | 39.1% | 344,576 | 51.7% |
| Erath | 31,284 | 2,225 | 1,432 | 1,357 | 1,862 | Erath | 1,836 | 1,807 | 733 | 958 | 19,074 | Erath | 5,014 | 16.0% | 6,876 | 22.0% | Erath | 8,712 | 27.8% | 12,210 | 39.0% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Falls | 16,448 | 1,558 | 970 | 1,192 | 1,270 | Falls | 1,164 | 837 | 556 | 533 | 8,368 | Falls | 3,720 | 22.6% | 4,990 | 30.3% | Falls | 6,154 | 37.4% | 8,080 | 49.1% |
| Fannin | 27,802 | 1,552 | 929 | 1,397 | 1,385 | Fannin | 1,442 | 1,232 | 629 | 1,098 | 18,138 | Fannin | 3,878 | 13.9% | 5,263 | 18.9% | Fannin | 6,705 | 24.1% | 9,664 | 34.8% |
| Fayette | 21,239 | 959 | 704 | 763 | 823 | Fayette | 1,192 | 1,143 | 558 | 561 | 14,536 | Fayette | 2,426 | 11.4% | 3,249 | 15.3% | Fayette | 4,441 | 20.9% | 6,703 | 31.6% |
| Fisher | 4,276 | 294 | 205 | 249 | 307 | Fisher | 274 | 265 | 106 | 113 | 2,463 | Fisher | 748 | 17.5% | 1,055 | 24.7% | Fisher | 1,329 | 31.1% | 1,813 | 42.4% |
| Floyd | 7,625 | 643 | 587 | 409 | 572 | Floyd | 634 | 466 | 79 | 198 | 4,037 | Floyd | 1,639 | 21.5% | 2,211 | 29.0% | Floyd | 2,845 | 37.3% | 3,588 | 47.1% |
| Foard | 1,577 | 45 | 97 | 83 | 154 | Foard | 85 | 179 | 24 | 73 | 837 | Foard | 225 | 14.3% | 379 | 24.0% | Foard | 464 | 29.4% | 740 | 46.9% |
| Fort Bend | 349,010 | 10,559 | 5,677 | 8,717 | 10,389 | Fort Bend | 11,526 | 10,749 | 4,562 | 6,361 | 280,470 | Fort Bend | 24,953 | 7.1% | 35,342 | 10.1% | Fort Bend | 46,868 | 13.4% | 68,540 | 19.6% |
| Franklin | 9,291 | 507 | 459 | 482 | 629 | Franklin | 595 | 552 | 144 | 366 | 5,557 | Franklin | 1,448 | 15.6% | 2,077 | 22.4% | Franklin | 2,672 | 28.8% | 3,734 | 40.2% |
| Freestone | 16,299 | 991 | 681 | 649 | 1,048 | Freestone | 1,210 | 806 | 387 | 603 | 9,924 | Freestone | 2,321 | 14.2% | 3,369 | 20.7% | Freestone | 4,579 | 28.1% | 6,375 | 39.1% |
| Frio | 14,126 | 1,585 | 1,417 | 1,089 | 1,595 | Frio | 1,024 | 939 | 353 | 573 | 5,551 | Frio | 4,091 | 29.0% | 5,686 | 40.3% | Frio | 6,710 | 47.5% | 8,575 | 60.7% |
| Gaines | 14,359 | 1,269 | 984 | 866 | 1,083 | Gaines | 1,147 | 828 | 376 | 657 | 7,149 | Gaines | 3,119 | 21.7% | 4,202 | 29.3% | Gaines | 5,349 | 37.3% | 7,210 | 50.2% |
| Galveston | 245,887 | 14,989 | 8,357 | 9,164 | 10,416 | Galveston | 10,386 | 10,757 | 4,939 | 5,490 | 171,389 | Galveston | 32,510 | 13.2% | 42,926 | 17.5% | Galveston | 53,312 | 21.7% | 74,498 | 30.3% |
| Garza | 4,386 | 458 | 246 | 276 | 208 | Garza | 581 | 366 | 94 | 143 | 2,014 | Garza | 980 | 22.3% | 1,188 | 27.1% | Garza | 1,769 | 40.3% | 2,372 | 54.1% |
| Gillespie | 20,287 | 576 | 569 | 922 | 913 | Gillespie | 1,046 | 908 | 473 | 474 | 14,406 | Gillespie | 2,067 | 10.2% | 2,980 | 14.7% | Gillespie | 4,026 | 19.8% | 5,881 | 29.0% |
| Glasscock | 1,404 | 74 | 71 | 62 | 93 | Glasscock | 109 | 82 | 31 | 74 | 808 | Glasscock | 207 | 14.7% | 300 | 21.4% | Glasscock | 409 | 29.1% | 596 | 42.5% |
| Goliad | 6,806 | 433 | 132 | 554 | 345 | Goliad | 305 | 340 | 127 | 283 | 4,287 | Goliad | 1,119 | 16.4% | 1,464 | 21.5% | Goliad | 1,769 | 26.0% | 2,519 | 37.0% |
| Gonzales | 18,267 | 1,232 | 1,025 | 1,132 | 1,518 | Gonzales | 1,428 | 1,426 | 535 | 617 | 9,354 | Gonzales | 3,389 | 18.6% | 4,907 | 26.9% | Gonzales | 6,335 | 34.7% | 8,913 | 48.8% |
| Gray | 20,962 | 1,062 | 905 | 931 | 1,046 | Gray | 1,129 | 1,147 | 556 | 772 | 13,414 | Gray | 2,898 | 13.8% | 3,944 | 18.8% | Gray | 5,073 | 24.2% | 7,548 | 36.0% |
| Grayson | 107,418 | 4,440 | 3,432 | 4,237 | 4,790 | Grayson | 5,234 | 4,692 | 2,683 | 3,374 | 74,536 | Grayson | 12,109 | 11.3% | 16,899 | 15.7% | Grayson | 22,133 | 20.6% | 32,882 | 30.6% |
| Gregg | 108,230 | 6,831 | 4,770 | 4,728 | 5,837 | Gregg | 5,873 | 5,426 | 2,294 | 2,902 | 69,569 | Gregg | 16,329 | 15.1% | 22,166 | 20.5% | Gregg | 28,039 | 25.9% | 38,661 | 35.7% |
| Grimes | 20,717 | 1,739 | 615 | 1,088 | 1,310 | Grimes | 1,125 | 1,508 | 681 | 615 | 12,036 | Grimes | 3,442 | 16.6% | 4,752 | 22.9% | Grimes | 5,877 | 28.4% | 8,681 | 41.9% |
| Guadalupe | 87,216 | 3,228 | 2,038 | 3,302 | 4,155 | Guadalupe | 3,910 | 4,621 | 1,624 | 2,696 | 61,642 | Guadalupe | 8,568 | 9.8% | 12,723 | 14.6% | Guadalupe | 16,633 | 19.1% | 25,574 | 29.3% |
| Hale | 34,171 | 2,243 | 1,836 | 2,062 | 2,179 | Hale | 2,905 | 2,377 | 1,069 | 1,415 | 18,085 | Hale | 6,141 | 18.0% | 8,320 | 24.3% | Hale | 11,225 | 32.8% | 16,086 | 47.1% |
| Hall | 3,742 | 409 | 264 | 312 | 305 | Hall | 305 | 298 | 111 | 118 | 1,620 | Hall | 985 | 26.3% | 1,290 | 34.5% | Hall | 1,595 | 42.6% | 2,122 | 56.7% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Hamilton | 7,962 | 433 | 258 | 442 | 473 | Hamilton | 519 | 437 | 279 | 185 | 4,936 | Hamilton | 1,133 | 14.2% | 1,606 | 20.2% | Hamilton | 2,125 | 26.7% | 3,026 | 38.0% |
| Hansford | 5,303 | 320 | 161 | 389 | 299 | Hansford | 262 | 328 | 64 | 143 | 3,337 | Hansford | 870 | 16.4% | 1,169 | 22.0% | Hansford | 1,431 | 27.0% | 1,966 | 37.1% |
| Hardeman | 4,660 | 269 | 286 | 274 | 365 | Hardeman | 221 | 417 | 87 | 136 | 2,605 | Hardeman | 829 | 17.8% | 1,194 | 25.6% | Hardeman | 1,415 | 30.4% | 2,055 | 44.1% |
| Hardin | 47,518 | 2,585 | 1,172 | 1,557 | 1,836 | Hardin | 2,079 | 2,856 | 977 | 1,820 | 32,636 | Hardin | 5,314 | 11.2% | 7,150 | 15.0% | Hardin | 9,229 | 19.4% | 14,882 | 31.3% |
| Harris | 3,360,536 | 231,746 | 126,547 | 144,941 | 171,344 | Harris | 179,998 | 166,951 | 65,806 | 93,576 | 2,179,627 | Harris | 503,234 | 15.0% | 674,578 | 20.1% | Harris | 854,576 | 25.4% | 1,180,909 | 35.1% |
| Harrison | 60,360 | 4,100 | 2,871 | 3,090 | 3,297 | Harrison | 3,030 | 2,747 | 1,602 | 1,723 | 37,900 | Harrison | 10,061 | 16.7% | 13,358 | 22.1% | Harrison | 16,388 | 27.2% | 22,460 | 37.2% |
| Hartley | 4,099 | 75 | 150 | 45 | 167 | Hartley | 212 | 174 | 75 | 73 | 3,128 | Hartley | 270 | 6.6% | 437 | 10.7% | Hartley | 649 | 15.8% | 971 | 23.7% |
| Haskell | 5,989 | 541 | 338 | 488 | 413 | Haskell | 398 | 471 | 126 | 284 | 2,930 | Haskell | 1,367 | 22.8% | 1,780 | 29.7% | Haskell | 2,178 | 36.4% | 3,059 | 51.1% |
| Hays | 91,446 | 6,954 | 2,930 | 3,155 | 3,289 | Hays | 4,151 | 3,855 | 1,370 | 2,132 | 63,610 | Hays | 13,039 | 14.3% | 16,328 | 17.9% | Hays | 20,479 | 22.4% | 27,836 | 30.4% |
| Hemphill | 3,206 | 110 | 129 | 164 | 214 | Hemphill | 212 | 100 | 90 | 99 | 2,088 | Hemphill | 403 | 12.6% | 617 | 19.2% | Hemphill | 829 | 25.9% | 1,118 | 34.9% |
| Henderson | 71,995 | 4,163 | 2,641 | 4,035 | 4,160 | Henderson | 4,475 | 4,340 | 2,281 | 2,214 | 43,686 | Henderson | 10,839 | 15.1% | 14,999 | 20.8% | Henderson | 19,474 | 27.0% | 28,309 | 39.3% |
| Hidalgo | 562,756 | 84,657 | 58,099 | 59,109 | 53,261 | Hidalgo | 45,914 | 36,948 | 13,560 | 17,434 | 193,774 | Hidalgo | 201,865 | 35.9% | 255,126 | 45.3% | Hidalgo | 301,040 | 53.5% | 368,982 | 65.6% |
| Hill | 31,510 | 2,055 | 1,209 | 1,675 | 2,235 | Hill | 2,303 | 1,830 | 690 | 880 | 18,633 | Hill | 4,939 | 15.7% | 7,174 | 22.8% | Hill | 9,477 | 30.1% | 12,877 | 40.9% |
| Hockley | 22,059 | 1,370 | 1,159 | 1,640 | 1,328 | Hockley | 1,813 | 1,591 | 625 | 727 | 11,806 | Hockley | 4,169 | 18.9% | 5,497 | 24.9% | Hockley | 7,310 | 33.1% | 10,253 | 46.5% |
| Hood | 40,562 | 1,377 | 756 | 1,319 | 1,475 | Hood | 1,690 | 1,880 | 644 | 1,091 | 30,330 | Hood | 3,452 | 8.5% | 4,927 | 12.1% | Hood | 6,617 | 16.3% | 10,232 | 25.2% |
| Hopkins | 31,376 | 1,741 | 1,136 | 1,703 | 1,733 | Hopkins | 2,043 | 1,774 | 883 | 1,010 | 19,353 | Hopkins | 4,580 | 14.6% | 6,313 | 20.1% | Hopkins | 8,356 | 26.6% | 12,023 | 38.3% |
| Houston | 20,135 | 1,912 | 1,021 | 1,286 | 1,048 | Houston | 1,175 | 1,166 | 425 | 624 | 11,478 | Houston | 4,219 | 21.0% | 5,267 | 26.2% | Houston | 6,442 | 32.0% | 8,657 | 43.0% |
| Howard | 28,874 | 2,134 | 1,529 | 1,703 | 1,888 | Howard | 1,476 | 1,774 | 1,155 | 758 | 16,457 | Howard | 5,366 | 18.6% | 7,254 | 25.1% | Howard | 8,730 | 30.2% | 12,417 | 43.0% |
| Hudspeth | 3,299 | 463 | 311 | 406 | 317 | Hudspeth | 320 | 219 | 58 | 136 | 1,069 | Hudspeth | 1,180 | 35.8% | 1,497 | 45.4% | Hudspeth | 1,817 | 55.1% | 2,230 | 67.6% |
| Hunt | 74,500 | 4,342 | 2,417 | 2,759 | 3,797 | Hunt | 3,661 | 4,013 | 1,818 | 2,566 | 49,127 | Hunt | 9,518 | 12.8% | 13,315 | 17.9% | Hunt | 16,976 | 22.8% | 25,373 | 34.1% |
| Hutchinson | 23,524 | 1,198 | 586 | 828 | 1,161 | Hutchinson | 1,458 | 1,324 | 454 | 762 | 15,753 | Hutchinson | 2,612 | 11.1% | 3,773 | 16.0% | Hutchinson | 5,231 | 22.2% | 7,771 | 33.0% |
| Irion | 1,759 | 35 | 37 | 76 | 106 | Irion | 121 | 87 | 36 | 72 | 1,189 | Irion | 148 | 8.4% | 254 | 14.4% | Irion | 375 | 21.3% | 570 | 32.4% |
| Jack | 7,640 | 381 | 275 | 333 | 462 | Jack | 469 | 520 | 201 | 141 | 4,858 | Jack | 989 | 12.9% | 1,451 | 19.0% | Jack | 1,920 | 25.1% | 2,782 | 36.4% |
| Jackson | 14,088 | 754 | 758 | 562 | 726 | Jackson | 637 | 740 | 375 | 437 | 9,099 | Jackson | 2,074 | 14.7% | 2,800 | 19.9% | Jackson | 3,437 | 24.4% | 4,989 | 35.4% |
| Jasper | 34,540 | 3,047 | 1,606 | 1,584 | 1,836 | Jasper | 2,257 | 2,158 | 887 | 1,282 | 19,883 | Jasper | 6,237 | 18.1% | 8,073 | 23.4% | Jasper | 10,330 | 29.9% | 14,657 | 42.4% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Jeff Davis | 2,138 | 111 | 52 | 158 | 111 | Jeff Davis | 145 | 164 | 49 | 90 | 1,258 | Jeff Davis | 321 | 15.0% | 432 | 20.2% | Jeff Davis | 577 | 27.0% | 880 | 41.2% |
| Jefferson | 236,846 | 20,308 | 10,365 | 10,469 | 12,415 | Jefferson | 12,844 | 12,110 | 4,857 | 6,379 | 147,099 | Jefferson | 41,142 | 17.4% | 53,557 | 22.6% | Jefferson | 66,401 | 28.0% | 89,747 | 37.9% |
| Jim Hogg | 5,184 | 500 | 426 | 419 | 356 | Jim Hogg | 328 | 432 | 56 | 195 | 2,472 | Jim Hogg | 1,345 | 25.9% | 1,701 | 32.8% | Jim Hogg | 2,029 | 39.1% | 2,712 | 52.3% |
| Jim Wells | 38,749 | 3,919 | 2,433 | 3,000 | 3,027 | Jim Wells | 2,442 | 2,891 | 1,129 | 1,554 | 18,354 | Jim Wells | 9,352 | 24.1% | 12,379 | 31.9% | Jim Wells | 14,821 | 38.2% | 20,395 | 52.6% |
| Johnson | 124,092 | 4,363 | 2,858 | 3,700 | 4,812 | Johnson | 5,581 | 5,622 | 2,555 | 3,149 | 91,452 | Johnson | 10,921 | 8.8% | 15,733 | 12.7% | Johnson | 21,314 | 17.2% | 32,640 | 26.3% |
| Jones | 15,793 | 893 | 751 | 1,009 | 972 | Jones | 1,179 | 1,326 | 430 | 422 | 8,811 | Jones | 2,653 | 16.8% | 3,625 | 23.0% | Jones | 4,804 | 30.4% | 6,982 | 44.2% |
| Karnes | 11,765 | 923 | 728 | 924 | 1,016 | Karnes | 984 | 731 | 318 | 331 | 5,810 | Karnes | 2,575 | 21.9% | 3,591 | 30.5% | Karnes | 4,575 | 38.9% | 5,955 | 50.6% |
| Kaufman | 69,648 | 3,002 | 1,748 | 2,563 | 3,059 | Kaufman | 2,946 | 2,938 | 1,293 | 1,792 | 50,307 | Kaufman | 7,313 | 10.5% | 10,372 | 14.9% | Kaufman | 13,318 | 19.1% | 19,341 | 27.8% |
| Kendall | 23,265 | 771 | 652 | 1,020 | 784 | Kendall | 756 | 848 | 360 | 492 | 17,582 | Kendall | 2,443 | 10.5% | 3,227 | 13.9% | Kendall | 3,983 | 17.1% | 5,683 | 24.4% |
| Kenedy | 398 | 13 | 18 | 30 | 46 | Kenedy | 49 | 35 | 32 | 43 | 132 | Kenedy | 61 | 15.3% | 107 | 26.9% | Kenedy | 156 | 39.2% | 266 | 66.8% |
| Kent | 821 | 49 | 12 | 24 | 67 | Kent | 37 | 91 | 54 | 17 | 470 | Kent | 85 | 10.4% | 152 | 18.5% | Kent | 189 | 23.0% | 351 | 42.8% |
| Kerr | 41,966 | 2,253 | 1,584 | 2,237 | 2,079 | Kerr | 2,226 | 2,202 | 905 | 1,202 | 27,278 | Kerr | 6,074 | 14.5% | 8,153 | 19.4% | Kerr | 10,379 | 24.7% | 14,688 | 35.0% |
| Kimble | 4,410 | 310 | 257 | 261 | 378 | Kimble | 201 | 226 | 93 | 102 | 2,582 | Kimble | 828 | 18.8% | 1,206 | 27.3% | Kimble | 1,407 | 31.9% | 1,828 | 41.5% |
| King | 324 | 44 | 16 | 7 | 9 | King | 14 | 18 | 15 | 27 | 174 | King | 67 | 20.7% | 76 | 23.5% | King | 90 | 27.8% | 150 | 46.3% |
| Kinney | 3,349 | 247 | 242 | 316 | 266 | Kinney | 291 | 140 | 79 | 126 | 1,642 | Kinney | 805 | 24.0% | 1,071 | 32.0% | Kinney | 1,362 | 40.7% | 1,707 | 51.0% |
| Kleberg | 30,060 | 4,207 | 1,990 | 1,831 | 2,517 | Kleberg | 1,585 | 1,434 | 804 | 782 | 14,910 | Kleberg | 8,028 | 26.7% | 10,545 | 35.1% | Kleberg | 12,130 | 40.4% | 15,150 | 50.4% |
| Knox | 4,112 | 332 | 303 | 307 | 310 | Knox | 402 | 237 | 98 | 110 | 2,013 | Knox | 942 | 22.9% | 1,252 | 30.4% | Knox | 1,654 | 40.2% | 2,099 | 51.0% |
| Lamar | 47,310 | 3,300 | 1,853 | 2,584 | 2,632 | Lamar | 2,974 | 3,020 | 1,221 | 1,210 | 28,516 | Lamar | 7,737 | 16.4% | 10,369 | 21.9% | Lamar | 13,343 | 28.2% | 18,794 | 39.7% |
| Lamb | 14,363 | 1,110 | 935 | 963 | 1,186 | Lamb | 1,216 | 1,052 | 436 | 504 | 6,961 | Lamb | 3,008 | 20.9% | 4,194 | 29.2% | Lamb | 5,410 | 37.7% | 7,402 | 51.5% |
| Lampasas | 17,365 | 1,184 | 619 | 640 | 763 | Lampasas | 869 | 1,111 | 401 | 672 | 11,106 | Lampasas | 2,443 | 14.1% | 3,206 | 18.5% | Lampasas | 4,075 | 23.5% | 6,259 | 36.0% |
| La Salle | 5,261 | 871 | 406 | 289 | 509 | La Salle | 531 | 371 | 177 | 110 | 1,997 | La Salle | 1,566 | 29.8% | 2,075 | 39.4% | La Salle | 2,606 | 49.5% | 3,264 | 62.0% |
| Lavaca | 18,739 | 770 | 714 | 996 | 1,096 | Lavaca | 1,327 | 916 | 699 | 719 | 11,502 | Lavaca | 2,480 | 13.2% | 3,576 | 19.1% | Lavaca | 4,903 | 26.2% | 7,237 | 38.6% |
| Lee | 14,968 | 833 | 389 | 554 | 705 | Lee | 908 | 655 | 274 | 543 | 10,107 | Lee | 1,776 | 11.9% | 2,481 | 16.6% | Lee | 3,389 | 22.6% | 4,861 | 32.5% |
| Leon | 15,205 | 944 | 610 | 811 | 934 | Leon | 879 | 672 | 299 | 278 | 9,778 | Leon | 2,365 | 15.6% | 3,299 | 21.7% | Leon | 4,178 | 27.5% | 5,427 | 35.7% |
| Liberty | 64,878 | 3,856 | 2,451 | 2,989 | 3,746 | Liberty | 3,062 | 3,384 | 1,279 | 1,886 | 42,225 | Liberty | 9,296 | 14.3% | 13,042 | 20.1% | Liberty | 16,104 | 24.8% | 22,653 | 34.9% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Limestone | 20,113 | 1,203 | 974 | 1,394 | 1,421 | Limestone | 1,571 | 1,005 | 517 | 549 | 11,479 | Limestone | 3,571 | 17.8% | 4,992 | 24.8% | Limestone | 6,563 | 32.6% | 8,634 | 42.9% |
| Lipscomb | 3,005 | 184 | 164 | 155 | 192 | Lipscomb | 165 | 168 | 92 | 66 | 1,819 | Lipscomb | 503 | 16.7% | 695 | 23.1% | Lipscomb | 860 | 28.6% | 1,186 | 39.5% |
| Live Oak | 10,722 | 730 | 460 | 579 | 766 | Live Oak | 634 | 572 | 182 | 302 | 6,497 | Live Oak | 1,769 | 16.5% | 2,535 | 23.6% | Live Oak | 3,169 | 29.6% | 4,225 | 39.4% |
| Llano | 16,798 | 663 | 497 | 573 | 1,028 | Llano | 902 | 635 | 572 | 507 | 11,421 | Llano | 1,733 | 10.3% | 2,761 | 16.4% | Llano | 3,663 | 21.8% | 5,377 | 32.0% |
| Loving | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Loving | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 54 | Loving | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | Loving | 0 | 0.0% | 13 | 19.4% |
| Lubbock | 233,046 | 18,926 | 10,343 | 12,273 | 12,771 | Lubbock | 14,204 | 13,658 | 5,138 | 7,142 | 138,591 | Lubbock | 41,542 | 17.8% | 54,313 | 23.3% | Lubbock | 68,517 | 29.4% | 94,455 | 40.5% |
| Lynn | 6,476 | 531 | 332 | 603 | 402 | Lynn | 662 | 504 | 210 | 139 | 3,093 | Lynn | 1,466 | 22.6% | 1,868 | 28.8% | Lynn | 2,530 | 39.1% | 3,383 | 52.2% |
| McCulloch | 7,997 | 689 | 508 | 601 | 577 | McCulloch | 629 | 610 | 472 | 241 | 3,670 | McCulloch | 1,798 | 22.5% | 2,375 | 29.7% | McCulloch | 3,004 | 37.6% | 4,327 | 54.1% |
| McLennan | 204,320 | 17,673 | 9,249 | 9,055 | 11,095 | McLennan | 12,065 | 11,271 | 4,456 | 6,462 | 122,994 | McLennan | 35,977 | 17.6% | 47,072 | 23.0% | McLennan | 59,137 | 28.9% | 81,326 | 39.8% |
| McMullen | 851 | 60 | 56 | 60 | 64 | McMullen | 24 | 64 | 12 | 17 | 494 | McMullen | 176 | 20.7% | 240 | 28.2% | McMullen | 264 | 31.0% | 357 | 42.0% |
| Madison | 10,059 | 712 | 373 | 503 | 649 | Madison | 744 | 709 | 251 | 297 | 5,821 | Madison | 1,588 | 15.8% | 2,237 | 22.2% | Madison | 2,981 | 29.6% | 4,238 | 42.1% |
| Marion | 10,847 | 1,083 | 551 | 791 | 748 | Marion | 786 | 604 | 259 | 303 | 5,722 | Marion | 2,425 | 22.4% | 3,173 | 29.3% | Marion | 3,959 | 36.5% | 5,125 | 47.2% |
| Martin | 4,655 | 352 | 211 | 309 | 352 | Martin | 346 | 425 | 148 | 198 | 2,314 | Martin | 872 | 18.7% | 1,224 | 26.3% | Martin | 1,570 | 33.7% | 2,341 | 50.3% |
| Mason | 3,697 | 166 | 150 | 172 | 228 | Mason | 271 | 298 | 65 | 127 | 2,220 | Mason | 488 | 13.2% | 716 | 19.4% | Mason | 987 | 26.7% | 1,477 | 40.0% |
| Matagorda | 37,367 | 3,101 | 2,020 | 1,792 | 2,068 | Matagorda | 1,984 | 2,081 | 774 | 940 | 22,607 | Matagorda | 6,913 | 18.5% | 8,981 | 24.0% | Matagorda | 10,965 | 29.3% | 14,760 | 39.5% |
| Maverick | 47,184 | 5,979 | 4,376 | 6,088 | 5,960 | Maverick | 4,400 | 3,615 | 1,112 | 1,724 | 13,930 | Maverick | 16,443 | 34.8% | 22,403 | 47.5% | Maverick | 26,803 | 56.8% | 33,254 | 70.5% |
| Medina | 37,545 | 2,252 | 1,663 | 1,879 | 2,674 | Medina | 1,979 | 2,544 | 724 | 1,073 | 22,757 | Medina | 5,794 | 15.4% | 8,468 | 22.6% | Medina | 10,447 | 27.8% | 14,788 | 39.4% |
| Menard | 2,315 | 211 | 224 | 162 | 131 | Menard | 145 | 125 | 105 | 100 | 1,112 | Menard | 597 | 25.8% | 728 | 31.4% | Menard | 873 | 37.7% | 1,203 | 52.0% |
| Midland | 114,397 | 5,868 | 4,011 | 4,879 | 5,943 | Midland | 6,970 | 5,746 | 2,307 | 2,719 | 75,954 | Midland | 14,758 | 12.9% | 20,701 | 18.1% | Midland | 27,671 | 24.2% | 38,443 | 33.6% |
| Milam | 23,719 | 1,566 | 1,106 | 1,105 | 1,400 | Milam | 1,474 | 1,526 | 534 | 656 | 14,352 | Milam | 3,777 | 15.9% | 5,177 | 21.8% | Milam | 6,651 | 28.0% | 9,367 | 39.5% |
| Mills | 4,904 | 376 | 195 | 329 | 370 | Mills | 267 | 348 | 121 | 127 | 2,771 | Mills | 900 | 18.4% | 1,270 | 25.9% | Mills | 1,537 | 31.3% | 2,133 | 43.5% |
| Mitchell | 6,999 | 422 | 304 | 511 | 449 | Mitchell | 627 | 596 | 161 | 218 | 3,711 | Mitchell | 1,237 | 17.7% | 1,686 | 24.1% | Mitchell | 2,313 | 33.0% | 3,288 | 47.0% |
| Montague | 18,696 | 942 | 678 | 992 | 1,244 | Montague | 1,137 | 1,094 | 468 | 611 | 11,530 | Montague | 2,612 | 14.0% | 3,856 | 20.6% | Montague | 4,993 | 26.7% | 7,166 | 38.3% |
| Montgomery | 291,519 | 11,899 | 6,786 | 8,691 | 10,271 | Montgomery | 11,662 | 12,031 | 5,448 | 6,207 | 218,524 | Montgomery | 27,376 | 9.4% | 37,647 | 12.9% | Montgomery | 49,309 | 16.9% | 72,995 | 25.0% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Moore | 19,867 | 1,141 | 519 | 1,021 | 1,579 | Moore | 1,454 | 1,814 | 458 | 594 | 11,287 | Moore | 2,681 | 13.5% | 4,260 | 21.4% | Moore | 5,714 | 28.8% | 8,580 | 43.2% |
| Morris | 12,871 | 1,055 | 561 | 737 | 619 | Morris | 835 | 986 | 315 | 511 | 7,252 | Morris | 2,353 | 18.3% | 2,972 | 23.1% | Morris | 3,807 | 29.6% | 5,619 | 43.7% |
| Motley | 1,420 | 144 | 62 | 70 | 58 | Motley | 100 | 80 | 45 | 24 | 837 | Motley | 276 | 19.4% | 334 | 23.5% | Motley | 434 | 30.6% | 583 | 41.1% |
| Nacogdoches | 54,637 | 6,449 | 3,158 | 3,136 | 3,177 | Nacogdoches | 3,347 | 2,939 | 1,453 | 1,545 | 29,433 | Nacogdoches | 12,743 | 23.3% | 15,920 | 29.1% | Nacogdoches | 19,267 | 35.3% | 25,204 | 46.1% |
| Navarro | 43,819 | 3,271 | 2,383 | 2,301 | 2,885 | Navarro | 2,683 | 2,653 | 1,152 | 1,337 | 25,154 | Navarro | 7,955 | 18.2% | 10,840 | 24.7% | Navarro | 13,523 | 30.9% | 18,665 | 42.6% |
| Newton | 14,461 | 1,144 | 656 | 960 | 1,077 | Newton | 970 | 972 | 515 | 665 | 7,502 | Newton | 2,760 | 19.1% | 3,837 | 26.5% | Newton | 4,807 | 33.2% | 6,959 | 48.1% |
| Nolan | 15,337 | 1,647 | 720 | 958 | 1,148 | Nolan | 999 | 1,118 | 237 | 389 | 8,121 | Nolan | 3,325 | 21.7% | 4,473 | 29.2% | Nolan | 5,472 | 35.7% | 7,216 | 47.0% |
| Nueces | 308,352 | 24,843 | 14,792 | 16,462 | 17,734 | Nueces | 19,179 | 17,752 | 5,927 | 9,163 | 182,500 | Nueces | 56,097 | 18.2% | 73,831 | 23.9% | Nueces | 93,010 | 30.2% | 125,852 | 40.8% |
| Ochiltree | 8,926 | 521 | 340 | 296 | 517 | Ochiltree | 504 | 553 | 331 | 143 | 5,721 | Ochiltree | 1,157 | 13.0% | 1,674 | 18.8% | Ochiltree | 2,178 | 24.4% | 3,205 | 35.9% |
| Oldham | 2,044 | 197 | 58 | 149 | 84 | Oldham | 122 | 92 | 29 | 129 | 1,184 | Oldham | 404 | 19.8% | 488 | 23.9% | Oldham | 610 | 29.8% | 860 | 42.1% |
| Orange | 83,755 | 5,392 | 3,116 | 3,010 | 3,533 | Orange | 4,247 | 3,639 | 2,129 | 2,312 | 56,377 | Orange | 11,518 | 13.8% | 15,051 | 18.0% | Orange | 19,298 | 23.0% | 27,378 | 32.7% |
| Palo Pinto | 26,586 | 1,571 | 991 | 1,659 | 1,637 | Palo Pinto | 1,868 | 1,848 | 556 | 1,052 | 15,404 | Palo Pinto | 4,221 | 15.9% | 5,858 | 22.0% | Palo Pinto | 7,726 | 29.1% | 11,182 | 42.1% |
| Panola | 22,296 | 1,560 | 840 | 751 | 1,181 | Panola | 1,543 | 1,509 | 461 | 795 | 13,656 | Panola | 3,151 | 14.1% | 4,332 | 19.4% | Panola | 5,875 | 26.4% | 8,640 | 38.8% |
| Parker | 85,280 | 2,821 | 1,951 | 2,297 | 2,660 | Parker | 3,703 | 3,600 | 1,633 | 1,974 | 64,641 | Parker | 7,069 | 8.3% | 9,729 | 11.4% | Parker | 13,432 | 15.8% | 20,639 | 24.2% |
| Parmer | 9,853 | 691 | 449 | 532 | 995 | Parmer | 853 | 653 | 299 | 370 | 5,011 | Parmer | 1,672 | 17.0% | 2,667 | 27.1% | Parmer | 3,520 | 35.7% | 4,842 | 49.1% |
| Pecos | 14,700 | 1,181 | 728 | 1,094 | 1,210 | Pecos | 1,132 | 1,124 | 301 | 569 | 7,361 | Pecos | 3,003 | 20.4% | 4,213 | 28.7% | Pecos | 5,345 | 36.4% | 7,339 | 49.9% |
| Polk | 37,658 | 2,713 | 1,849 | 1,978 | 2,592 | Polk | 2,434 | 2,506 | 853 | 1,441 | 21,292 | Polk | 6,540 | 17.4% | 9,132 | 24.2% | Polk | 11,566 | 30.7% | 16,366 | 43.5% |
| Potter | 106,654 | 8,510 | 5,076 | 6,892 | 7,129 | Potter | 8,602 | 7,387 | 2,901 | 3,927 | 56,230 | Potter | 20,478 | 19.2% | 27,607 | 25.9% | Potter | 36,209 | 33.9% | 50,424 | 47.3% |
| Presidio | 7,197 | 842 | 798 | 977 | 787 | Presidio | 621 | 496 | 215 | 227 | 2,234 | Presidio | 2,617 | 36.4% | 3,404 | 47.3% | Presidio | 4,025 | 55.9% | 4,963 | 69.0% |
| Rains | 9,048 | 506 | 403 | 435 | 382 | Rains | 484 | 650 | 163 | 265 | 5,760 | Rains | 1,344 | 14.9% | 1,726 | 19.1% | Rains | 2,210 | 24.4% | 3,288 | 36.3% |
| Randall | 102,304 | 3,272 | 2,288 | 2,701 | 3,456 | Randall | 4,005 | 4,214 | 2,041 | 2,730 | 77,597 | Randall | 8,261 | 8.1% | 11,717 | 11.5% | Randall | 15,722 | 15.4% | 24,707 | 24.2% |
| Reagan | 3,271 | 154 | 97 | 136 | 204 | Reagan | 323 | 301 | 120 | 202 | 1,734 | Reagan | 387 | 11.8% | 591 | 18.1% | Reagan | 914 | 27.9% | 1,537 | 47.0% |
| Real | 2,963 | 181 | 174 | 274 | 249 | Real | 266 | 214 | 89 | 88 | 1,428 | Real | 629 | 21.2% | 878 | 29.6% | Real | 1,144 | 38.6% | 1,535 | 51.8% |
| Red River | 13,983 | 792 | 751 | 883 | 920 | Red River | 1,001 | 1,033 | 331 | 432 | 7,840 | Red River | 2,426 | 17.3% | 3,346 | 23.9% | Red River | 4,347 | 31.1% | 6,143 | 43.9% |
| Reeves | 12,008 | 1,312 | 917 | 1,240 | 1,206 | Reeves | 1,185 | 869 | 369 | 390 | 4,520 | Reeves | 3,469 | 28.9% | 4,675 | 38.9% | Reeves | 5,860 | 48.8% | 7,488 | 62.4% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Refugio | 7,701 | 527 | 428 | 414 | 617 | Refugio | 526 | 350 | 189 | 220 | 4,430 | Refugio | 1,369 | 17.8% | 1,986 | 25.8% | Refugio | 2,512 | 32.6% | 3,271 | 42.5% |
| Roberts | 880 | 17 | 20 | 26 | 32 | Roberts | 21 | 36 | 21 | 17 | 690 | Roberts | 63 | 7.2% | 95 | 10.8% | Roberts | 116 | 13.2% | 190 | 21.6% |
| Robertson | 15,712 | 1,981 | 695 | 567 | 1,017 | Robertson | 918 | 909 | 452 | 371 | 8,802 | Robertson | 3,243 | 20.6% | 4,260 | 27.1% | Robertson | 5,178 | 33.0% | 6,910 | 44.0% |
| Rockwall | 42,392 | 887 | 444 | 654 | 1,088 | Rockwall | 1,182 | 1,419 | 549 | 670 | 35,499 | Rockwall | 1,985 | 4.7% | 3,073 | 7.2% | Rockwall | 4,255 | 10.0% | 6,893 | 16.3% |
| Runnels | 11,203 | 1,177 | 474 | 497 | 826 | Runnels | 657 | 817 | 391 | 307 | 6,057 | Runnels | 2,148 | 19.2% | 2,974 | 26.5% | Runnels | 3,631 | 32.4% | 5,146 | 45.9% |
| Rusk | 44,564 | 2,537 | 1,933 | 2,056 | 2,651 | Rusk | 2,457 | 2,710 | 1,335 | 1,329 | 27,556 | Rusk | 6,526 | 14.6% | 9,177 | 20.6% | Rusk | 11,634 | 26.1% | 17,008 | 38.2% |
| Sabine | 10,313 | 743 | 372 | 528 | 775 | Sabine | 667 | 595 | 214 | 271 | 6,148 | Sabine | 1,643 | 15.9% | 2,418 | 23.4% | Sabine | 3,085 | 29.9% | 4,165 | 40.4% |
| San Augustine | 8,688 | 910 | 479 | 451 | 439 | San Augustine | 805 | 470 | 232 | 323 | 4,579 | San Augustine | 1,840 | 21.2% | 2,279 | 26.2% | San Augustine | 3,084 | 35.5% | 4,109 | 47.3% |
| San Jacinto | 22,049 | 1,913 | 969 | 1,268 | 1,270 | San Jacinto | 1,194 | 1,034 | 508 | 763 | 13,130 | San Jacinto | 4,150 | 18.8% | 5,420 | 24.6% | San Jacinto | 6,614 | 30.0% | 8,919 | 40.5% |
| San Patricio | 65,489 | 5,062 | 3,318 | 3,424 | 3,499 | San Patricio | 3,784 | 3,884 | 1,574 | 2,311 | 38,633 | San Patricio | 11,804 | 18.0% | 15,303 | 23.4% | San Patricio | 19,087 | 29.1% | 26,856 | 41.0% |
| San Saba | 5,636 | 394 | 273 | 269 | 369 | San Saba | 400 | 294 | 158 | 183 | 3,296 | San Saba | 936 | 16.6% | 1,305 | 23.2% | San Saba | 1,705 | 30.3% | 2,340 | 41.5% |
| Schleicher | 2,886 | 180 | 190 | 251 | 209 | Schleicher | 147 | 138 | 20 | 80 | 1,671 | Schleicher | 621 | 21.5% | 830 | 28.8% | Schleicher | 977 | 33.9% | 1,215 | 42.1% |
| Scurry | 14,658 | 763 | 619 | 960 | 983 | Scurry | 918 | 829 | 417 | 459 | 8,710 | Scurry | 2,342 | 16.0% | 3,325 | 22.7% | Scurry | 4,243 | 28.9% | 5,948 | 40.6% |
| Shackelford | 3,248 | 165 | 84 | 192 | 273 | Shackelford | 200 | 163 | 78 | 127 | 1,966 | Shackelford | 441 | 13.6% | 714 | 22.0% | Shackelford | 914 | 28.1% | 1,282 | 39.5% |
| Shelby | 24,747 | 2,021 | 1,346 | 1,433 | 1,856 | Shelby | 1,878 | 1,598 | 754 | 736 | 13,125 | Shelby | 4,800 | 19.4% | 6,656 | 26.9% | Shelby | 8,534 | 34.5% | 11,622 | 47.0% |
| Sherman | 3,134 | 226 | 100 | 180 | 217 | Sherman | 208 | 177 | 80 | 74 | 1,872 | Sherman | 506 | 16.1% | 723 | 23.1% | Sherman | 931 | 29.7% | 1,262 | 40.3% |
| Smith | 170,795 | 9,275 | 6,393 | 7,875 | 8,804 | Smith | 9,564 | 9,139 | 3,672 | 4,954 | 111,119 | Smith | 23,543 | 13.8% | 32,347 | 18.9% | Smith | 41,911 | 24.5% | 59,676 | 34.9% |
| Somervell | 6,597 | 310 | 120 | 135 | 362 | Somervell | 254 | 405 | 214 | 186 | 4,611 | Somervell | 565 | 8.6% | 927 | 14.1% | Somervell | 1,181 | 17.9% | 1,986 | 30.1% |
| Starr | 53,140 | 11,483 | 7,770 | 7,789 | 4,965 | Starr | 4,046 | 3,379 | 1,470 | 1,216 | 11,022 | Starr | 27,042 | 50.9% | 32,007 | 60.2% | Starr | 36,053 | 67.8% | 42,118 | 79.3% |
| Stephens | 8,971 | 558 | 284 | 559 | 495 | Stephens | 689 | 451 | 357 | 151 | 5,427 | Stephens | 1,401 | 15.6% | 1,896 | 21.1% | Stephens | 2,585 | 28.8% | 3,544 | 39.5% |
| Sterling | 1,367 | 46 | 44 | 140 | 59 | Sterling | 48 | 113 | 16 | 57 | 844 | Sterling | 230 | 16.8% | 289 | 21.1% | Sterling | 337 | 24.7% | 523 | 38.3% |
| Stonewall | 1,646 | 132 | 86 | 100 | 110 | Stonewall | 87 | 74 | 41 | 40 | 976 | Stonewall | 318 | 19.3% | 428 | 26.0% | Stonewall | 515 | 31.3% | 670 | 40.7% |
| Sutton | 4,042 | 265 | 191 | 270 | 230 | Sutton | 224 | 168 | 168 | 114 | 2,412 | Sutton | 726 | 18.0% | 956 | 23.7% | Sutton | 1,180 | 29.2% | 1,630 | 40.3% |
| Swisher | 7,761 | 651 | 220 | 476 | 479 | Swisher | 532 | 607 | 176 | 383 | 4,237 | Swisher | 1,347 | 17.4% | 1,826 | 23.5% | Swisher | 2,358 | 30.4% | 3,524 | 45.4% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Tarrant | 1,421,383 | 69,010 | 37,190 | 44,288 | 53,514 | Tarrant | 59,412 | 63,253 | 29,136 | 33,965 | 1,031,615 | Tarrant | 150,488 | 10.6% | 204,002 | 14.4% | Tarrant | 263,414 | 18.5% | 389,768 | 27.4% |
| Taylor | 121,199 | 7,563 | 4,419 | 5,648 | 7,029 | Taylor | 7,728 | 6,531 | 3,467 | 3,793 | 75,021 | Taylor | 17,630 | 14.5% | 24,659 | 20.3% | Taylor | 32,387 | 26.7% | 46,178 | 38.1% |
| Terrell | 1,075 | 115 | 59 | 97 | 89 | Terrell | 73 | 56 | 19 | 42 | 525 | Terrell | 271 | 25.2% | 360 | 33.5% | Terrell | 433 | 40.3% | 550 | 51.2% |
| Terry | 11,754 | 1,102 | 612 | 1,019 | 900 | Terry | 1,031 | 852 | 451 | 345 | 5,442 | Terry | 2,733 | 23.3% | 3,633 | 30.9% | Terry | 4,664 | 39.7% | 6,312 | 53.7% |
| Throckmorton | 1,826 | 101 | 89 | 56 | 168 | Throckmorton | 90 | 89 | 37 | 117 | 1,079 | Throckmorton | 246 | 13.5% | 414 | 22.7% | Throckmorton | 504 | 27.6% | 747 | 40.9% |
| Titus | 27,485 | 1,858 | 1,371 | 1,854 | 2,148 | Titus | 1,589 | 2,194 | 854 | 837 | 14,780 | Titus | 5,083 | 18.5% | 7,231 | 26.3% | Titus | 8,820 | 32.1% | 12,705 | 46.2% |
| Tom Green | 99,944 | 5,536 | 4,381 | 5,276 | 6,071 | Tom Green | 5,837 | 5,720 | 2,674 | 3,430 | 61,019 | Tom Green | 15,193 | 15.2% | 21,264 | 21.3% | Tom Green | 27,101 | 27.1% | 38,925 | 38.9% |
| Travis | 793,476 | 52,330 | 22,287 | 24,771 | 30,710 | Travis | 33,198 | 32,018 | 13,661 | 16,836 | 567,665 | Travis | 99,388 | 12.5% | 130,098 | 16.4% | Travis | 163,296 | 20.6% | 225,811 | 28.5% |
| Trinity | 13,582 | 947 | 605 | 842 | 955 | Trinity | 960 | 833 | 390 | 425 | 7,625 | Trinity | 2,394 | 17.6% | 3,349 | 24.7% | Trinity | 4,309 | 31.7% | 5,957 | 43.9% |
| Tyler | 19,278 | 1,350 | 884 | 810 | 1,222 | Tyler | 1,274 | 1,181 | 417 | 626 | 11,514 | Tyler | 3,044 | 15.8% | 4,266 | 22.1% | Tyler | 5,540 | 28.7% | 7,764 | 40.3% |
| Upshur | 34,676 | 2,224 | 1,330 | 1,613 | 1,873 | Upshur | 2,035 | 1,915 | 968 | 1,249 | 21,469 | Upshur | 5,167 | 14.9% | 7,040 | 20.3% | Upshur | 9,075 | 26.2% | 13,207 | 38.1% |
| Upton | 3,358 | 298 | 106 | 265 | 209 | Upton | 314 | 206 | 36 | 138 | 1,786 | Upton | 669 | 19.9% | 878 | 26.1% | Upton | 1,192 | 35.5% | 1,572 | 46.8% |
| Uvalde | 25,378 | 2,215 | 1,727 | 2,221 | 1,816 | Uvalde | 2,968 | 1,435 | 603 | 732 | 11,661 | Uvalde | 6,163 | 24.3% | 7,979 | 31.4% | Uvalde | 10,947 | 43.1% | 13,717 | 54.1% |
| Val Verde | 44,040 | 3,965 | 3,765 | 3,777 | 3,042 | Val Verde | 3,668 | 3,168 | 796 | 1,750 | 20,109 | Val Verde | 11,507 | 26.1% | 14,549 | 33.0% | Val Verde | 18,217 | 41.4% | 23,931 | 54.3% |
| Van Zandt | 47,364 | 2,586 | 1,732 | 1,980 | 2,719 | Van Zandt | 2,416 | 2,695 | 1,232 | 1,540 | 30,464 | Van Zandt | 6,298 | 13.3% | 9,017 | 19.0% | Van Zandt | 11,433 | 24.1% | 16,900 | 35.7% |
| Victoria | 82,527 | 3,925 | 2,921 | 3,835 | 4,676 | Victoria | 4,147 | 4,342 | 1,870 | 2,693 | 54,118 | Victoria | 10,681 | 12.9% | 15,357 | 18.6% | Victoria | 19,504 | 23.6% | 28,409 | 34.4% |
| Walker | 44,904 | 4,103 | 1,987 | 2,163 | 2,909 | Walker | 2,454 | 2,335 | 1,110 | 1,069 | 26,774 | Walker | 8,253 | 18.4% | 11,162 | 24.9% | Walker | 13,616 | 30.3% | 18,130 | 40.4% |
| Waller | 29,487 | 1,940 | 1,578 | 1,200 | 1,694 | Waller | 1,753 | 1,604 | 610 | 847 | 18,261 | Waller | 4,718 | 16.0% | 6,412 | 21.7% | Waller | 8,165 | 27.7% | 11,226 | 38.1% |
| Ward | 10,518 | 764 | 614 | 508 | 626 | Ward | 816 | 714 | 323 | 300 | 5,853 | Ward | 1,886 | 17.9% | 2,512 | 23.9% | Ward | 3,328 | 31.6% | 4,665 | 44.4% |
| Washington | 28,597 | 1,784 | 1,022 | 884 | 1,552 | Washington | 1,586 | 1,889 | 938 | 491 | 18,451 | Washington | 3,690 | 12.9% | 5,242 | 18.3% | Washington | 6,828 | 23.9% | 10,146 | 35.5% |
| Webb | 190,359 | 23,068 | 17,205 | 19,066 | 17,886 | Webb | 15,764 | 12,330 | 4,592 | 6,111 | 74,337 | Webb | 59,339 | 31.2% | 77,225 | 40.6% | Webb | 92,989 | 48.8% | 116,022 | 60.9% |
| Wharton | 40,519 | 2,745 | 2,019 | 1,939 | 2,417 | Wharton | 2,917 | 2,087 | 945 | 1,571 | 23,879 | Wharton | 6,703 | 16.5% | 9,120 | 22.5% | Wharton | 12,037 | 29.7% | 16,640 | 41.1% |
| Wheeler | 5,135 | 190 | 236 | 241 | 231 | Wheeler | 448 | 327 | 194 | 171 | 3,097 | Wheeler | 667 | 13.0% | 898 | 17.5% | Wheeler | 1,346 | 26.2% | 2,038 | 39.7% |
| Wichita | 120,522 | 6,611 | 4,005 | 5,280 | 6,415 | Wichita | 6,850 | 7,062 | 3,222 | 3,983 | 77,094 | Wichita | 15,896 | 13.2% | 22,311 | 18.5% | Wichita | 29,161 | 24.2% | 43,428 | 36.0% |
| Wilbarger | 13,747 | 615 | 402 | 779 | 892 | Wilbarger | 958 | 686 | 263 | 468 | 8,684 | Wilbarger | 1,796 | 13.1% | 2,688 | 19.6% | Wilbarger | 3,646 | 26.5% | 5,063 | 36.8% |
| Willacy | 18,969 | 2,417 | 1,764 | 2,119 | 1,999 | Willacy | 1,571 | 1,367 | 792 | 631 | 6,309 | Willacy | 6,300 | 33.2% | 8,299 | 43.8% | Willacy | 9,870 | 52.0% | 12,660 | 66.7% |
| County | Total Census 2000 -- Population For Whom Poverty Status Was Determined | Under 50% | 50 to 74% | 75 to 99% | 100 to 124% | County | 125 to 149% | 150 to 174% | 175 to 184% | 185 to 199% | 200% or Higher | County | Under 100% of Poverty | Percent Under 100% of Poverty | Under 125% of Poverty | Percent Under 125% of Poverty | County | Under 150% of Poverty | Percent Under 150% of Poverty | Under 200% of Poverty | Percent Under 200% of Poverty |
| Williamson | 244,927 | 4,795 | 2,684 | 4,256 | 4,687 | Williamson | 6,641 | 6,200 | 2,758 | 3,790 | 209,116 | Williamson | 11,735 | 4.8% | 16,422 | 6.7% | Williamson | 23,063 | 9.4% | 35,811 | 14.6% |
| Wilson | 31,717 | 1,434 | 822 | 1,333 | 1,430 | Wilson | 1,875 | 1,730 | 809 | 992 | 21,292 | Wilson | 3,589 | 11.3% | 5,019 | 15.8% | Wilson | 6,894 | 21.7% | 10,425 | 32.9% |
| Winkler | 7,033 | 568 | 286 | 460 | 412 | Winkler | 479 | 441 | 255 | 446 | 3,686 | Winkler | 1,314 | 18.7% | 1,726 | 24.5% | Winkler | 2,205 | 31.4% | 3,347 | 47.6% |
| Wise | 47,597 | 2,005 | 1,258 | 1,426 | 1,870 | Wise | 2,691 | 2,409 | 1,020 | 919 | 33,999 | Wise | 4,689 | 9.9% | 6,559 | 13.8% | Wise | 9,250 | 19.4% | 13,598 | 28.6% |
| Wood | 35,318 | 2,021 | 1,528 | 1,502 | 1,632 | Wood | 1,948 | 2,101 | 1,134 | 883 | 22,569 | Wood | 5,051 | 14.3% | 6,683 | 18.9% | Wood | 8,631 | 24.4% | 12,749 | 36.1% |
| Yoakum | 7,271 | 464 | 533 | 425 | 585 | Yoakum | 393 | 777 | 197 | 219 | 3,678 | Yoakum | 1,422 | 19.6% | 2,007 | 27.6% | Yoakum | 2,400 | 33.0% | 3,593 | 49.4% |
| Young | 17,611 | 938 | 544 | 1,281 | 772 | Young | 1,330 | 1,212 | 426 | 672 | 10,436 | Young | 2,763 | 15.7% | 3,535 | 20.1% | Young | 4,865 | 27.6% | 7,175 | 40.7% |
| Zapata | 12,124 | 1,606 | 1,296 | 1,439 | 610 | Zapata | 618 | 881 | 412 | 457 | 4,805 | Zapata | 4,341 | 35.8% | 4,951 | 40.8% | Zapata | 5,569 | 45.9% | 7,319 | 60.4% |
| Zavala | 11,234 | 2,383 | 1,310 | 999 | 1,272 | Zavala | 914 | 718 | 390 | 215 | 3,033 | Zavala | 4,692 | 41.8% | 5,964 | 53.1% | Zavala | 6,878 | 61.2% | 8,201 | 73.0% |
| Texas | 20,283,230 | 1,316,012 | 739,206 | 887,911 | 1,003,438 | Texas | 1,044,120 | 969,895 | 367,576 | 500,881 | 12,983,873 | Texas | 3,117,609 | 15.4% | 4,172,890 | 20.6% | Texas | 5,270,683 | 26.0% | 7,294,328 | 36.0% |
| Data Source: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Census of 2000 for Texas. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary File 3A. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| TXHHSC Contact: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Edli E. Colberg | |||||||||||||||||||||
| edli.colberg@hhsc.state.tx.us | |||||||||||||||||||||